“Singing reversal”? Why did Baoma give up Suger Baby pure electric platform

requestId:685d5497955a61.42155954.

When it comes to electric transformation, Baoma should be one of the earliest traditional car companies to wake up. As early as 2004, the company began to experiment with light mixed structures and released its first pure electric car model Baoma i3 in 2013. But unexpectedly, Baoma, who is extremely aggressive in the field of electric technology, recently publicly sang a remark, proclaiming that she would not be able to get out of bed on the future of the pure electric car. The man who was on a business trip suddenly appeared and was a special platform.

Your arsenic, my honey, although his desire was “broken” by Baoma, pure electric platform has been “respected as being paid” in companies such as Tesla, the public, and General Motors. Why do divergent enterprises have such a disagreement attitude towards pure electric flats? How beautiful will pure electric platform play in the future of enterprise electric power? Is it because of lack of technical strength or is it because of capital considerations?

★It is easy to use, but not good

In the eyes of Mary Barra, General Motors Chairman and CEO, his pure electric platform is the key to the company’s comprehensive transformation of electric power and will continue to make profits in the future; in the eyes of Herbert dies, CEO of the major automobile group, because it owns a pure electric platform, as long as Tesla is worthy of competing with the majority group in the future. What “magic” can make the people in these automobile circles so full of beliefs?

First, the car model produced under a pure electric platform will be doubled. Taking the majority MEB module electric architecture as an example, the platform is a layout design that surrounds the battery assembly, and the battery is embedded into the bottom of the car, and the axle module and the transmission system module are separated by each other to achieve the achievement. Longer, giving the car a longer axle and a shorter front and rear stairs, can bring more internal space to provide consumers with higher sitting positions. It is precisely because of the characteristics of this platform that many car judgingers dozed off when rated ID.3. After waking up, she found that she turned out to be a supporting role in the book, and her car had “Golf’s size, Pasette’s space.”

In terms of battery, the MEB module electric architecture can apply power batteries with divergent capacity based on the differences in the car model setting and installation, and can be compatible with the design of round columns, squares and soft-packed cores without affecting the system integration layer. It is clear that when consumers buy ID.3, they can choose between three different continuous miles according to their own needs.

InIn the above aspects, the traditional “oil-to-electric” vehicle model is difficult to achieve. Since the production platform is developed based on fuel vehicle demand, the “oil-to-electric” model will suffer from many limitations in space applications, which are all inferior. It is like the low-level gap affecting the vehicle’s passing through, the floor inside the car reduces the comfort of passengers, and the “bulge” below the rear seats occupying the passenger’s leg space, etc. Today, the pure electric car model iXSugar daddy3 under Baoma has not yet been launched. I wonder if consumers can find familiar highlights on this car?

Secondly, pure electric platform can double the standardization of each component and cover more car models, which can greatly reduce the cost of parts purchase and vehicle research and development, and this decrease in cost will continue to decline as the platform’s car model production continues.

Dis once said in front of the media: “Based on the MEB module electric architecture, the production cost of ID.3 is reduced by 40% compared with the previous e-Golf, and the entire factory is dedicated to the production of electric vehicles. The money will also drop by about 5%-10% compared to fuel-car/electric vehicle hybrid production.” A survey report released by McKenxi also showed that a pure electric platform produces an average energy payment of about US$2,400 (about RMB 16,800) for every car produced.

In the eyes of many people, the development level of pure electric platform is not high. In China, companies such as Guangqi Group, Jixiang Automobile, Changcheng Automobile, and even companies such as NIO and Viagra that have not been established have their own pure electric platforms. However, there are differences in the requirements of different companies, and the standards for pure electric platforms are also different. It is actually not difficult to develop a set of pure electric platforms that are truly “interesting”.

Taking Odi as an example, German “Manager’s Journal” once revealed the company’s bitter journey in the research and development of pure electric platforms. Previously, Odi and Polytechnic cooperated with the development of the PPE platform. With the cooperation of both parties, the platform has achieved basic research and development success, but in Escort After the test, Odi discovered that the production cost of the platform is much worse than that of Tesla’s electric platform, with an average production cost of 3,000 euros (about 22,700 RMB) higher than that of the car. Based on the brand positioning of ultra-luxury, Bose can accept this difference, but for Odi, who is working hard to be the leader of luxury brand electric, he said thatThis obvious gap in Sla is something that the brand cannot accept. So Odi reluctantly pushed his “return” to continue research and development, which formed a major resource waste, and the original goal of “the first mass-produced product in the offline line in 2022” will also be delayed.

★Will the huge capital be “refunded” the baby? As a “sharp knife” within the group, Odi cooperates with Baoshijie and has experience in developing MEB module electric motor architecture. It has not been able to develop an electric motor platform that can compete with Tesla. It is also not difficult for Baoma, who has the same goal, to develop a pure electric motor platform. But this does not seem to mean that Baoma has not been able to develop pure electric platforms. On the contrary, Baoma has one or two technical strengths in the field of electric technology. In terms of talent, Christian Senger, a member of the Board of Directors of the Group of Automobile Brand, and the responsible person for digital automobiles and services, worked at the Bama Group for 15 years before joining the league; in terms of results, before MEB’s lifetime, Bama had developed a subversive pure electric platform, LifeDrive module architecture. In the field of electric transformation, Baoma can be said to be “people need people, technology need technology”. However, Baoma is not willing to bear the huge research and development cost of pure electric platform itself and the subsequent factory reconstruction and opening up.